Welcome to the Book Blogger Hop! Thank you to our host at Crazy for Books! Take a look around. A little bit about our blog:
We are a husband (-D) and wife (-L) team of bloggers, writing about extremely varied books.
We are attempting to get through a book a week this year (the wife is woefully behind).
We are happy to hear from you and get feedback; so please comment, comment, comment!
Lately I have been immersing myself in the book blog world (who knew it was so large). I have found some great blogs that inspire. Here's some links:
New Dork Review of Books
Page Turners
The Reading Ape
Book Lust
Enjoy!
-L
Thursday, May 20, 2010
Wednesday, May 19, 2010
The Poisonwood Bible
Upon opening this week's book, I was immediately struck with the feeling I would never get through it. The prose is so ethereal and without context. My persistence was rewarded upon turning the first page of the first section: The Things We Carried. I was suddenly immersed in a world of context narrated by the female relations of a missionary man from Georgia, setting himself and his family down in the strange land of the Congo at the precipice of independence. His ignorance of almost everything in life leaves scars on his daughters, his wife, and even himself; only he is unable to recognize or admit them. The tale of The Poisonwood Bible (by Barbara Kingsolver) is one of striving for the purpose of independence to find there is no such thing. Oppression is the lot of all men in life - it is just a matter of one's perspective on their suffering. Do you choose to submit under the hand of an angry god? Do you choose to build a life of the scraps of hope you find along the way? How will you survive a land so destructive even the jungle will creep in on you, seeking dominion, if you turn your back on it for a moment?
The themes of this book are worn on it's sleeve. They permeate every page with an outspokenness that must fit the struggles for independence of all conquered nations. If someone does not stand up and raise their voice, there will never be freedom, right? In telling this story oppression must be defined. Kingsolver accomplishes this through the first two books: Genesis and Revelation. She identifies the major players in their respective roles of oppressor and oppressed, each a metaphor for the greater struggle for Congolese independence. The third (Judges) serves as the wake-up-call to the consciousness of all involved. There must be a paradigm shift; something must change. The last four books cover the ground of independence sought and gained (?).
Maybe it is just me, but the last couple of books really could have been left off. Maybe it is the free person in me that understands the struggle, the attainment, that doesn't need reminders of a life of oppression left behind. They slithered and crawled and worked their way free, I don't need a recap of the rest of their lives. They are free, right? Well, "not so much," says Kingsolver. They only thought they were free, they were only free of certain things. They still have the memories. The memories will never free them, no matter how they deal with them.
Memory is the device of the narrators of this tale. All is told in reminiscence. All is recounted with the understanding of what happened in the end, where each person ended up. In keeping with this Kingsolver foreshadows many of the plot points in a heavy-handed way. For the most part the reader knows what is going to happen well before the action takes place. Somehow it doesn't mar the story. It reads like a person telling a joke and letting slip the punchline, long before they are supposed to. It doesn't mean it is not just as enjoyable, it is just not surprising.
Memory also is the thing each person carries out of the Congo with them. The memory of what has happened shapes the lives of each character. Each character remains true to the original sketch of themselves, but because we are looking back, they tell only the things they think are important to who they are now. Each one a pragmatist, a scholar, a narcissist, a survivor. The reader gets from them just what they want to give; but cleverly, he knows more about them than they think he does. This is due to the device of multiple narrators. Kingsolver tells her story through the eyes of the Price women. Each is a a fully realized character, with her own narrative style. My favorite is Adah, the crooked-backed, palindrome spouting, lesser-twin to Leah. Her story resonates more fully because she uses words sparingly and speaks even fewer. Her chapters are rich because the reader would not know her otherwise. Each of the other characters are easily understood through the telling of their counterparts; but because Adah is silent most of the time, she is privileged to tell her story her way. She is easily one of the most compelling characters in modern literature.
With memory comes regret. Kingsolver deals with this in various ways, but no more clearly than here, the words of Orleanna Price:
I could write a whole other post on the particulars of the theology that took them there. A works-based system, insisting the justice (in human perception) of God would reward the "goodness" of a man bent on becoming a spiritual giant, without any of the tools necessary. I would set it against the backdrop of a tribal theology that is not very far displaced from the theology of the missionary, just set on a different focal point. This could be discussed in grand detail to tedium by this humble church history (theology) major, but I have already said the most important stuff regarding this book. Read it for yourself and discover a world of themes hidden just under the skin, like the zillion parasites of the Congolese jungle.
Rating: 4.5 out of 7
-L
The themes of this book are worn on it's sleeve. They permeate every page with an outspokenness that must fit the struggles for independence of all conquered nations. If someone does not stand up and raise their voice, there will never be freedom, right? In telling this story oppression must be defined. Kingsolver accomplishes this through the first two books: Genesis and Revelation. She identifies the major players in their respective roles of oppressor and oppressed, each a metaphor for the greater struggle for Congolese independence. The third (Judges) serves as the wake-up-call to the consciousness of all involved. There must be a paradigm shift; something must change. The last four books cover the ground of independence sought and gained (?).
Maybe it is just me, but the last couple of books really could have been left off. Maybe it is the free person in me that understands the struggle, the attainment, that doesn't need reminders of a life of oppression left behind. They slithered and crawled and worked their way free, I don't need a recap of the rest of their lives. They are free, right? Well, "not so much," says Kingsolver. They only thought they were free, they were only free of certain things. They still have the memories. The memories will never free them, no matter how they deal with them.
Memory is the device of the narrators of this tale. All is told in reminiscence. All is recounted with the understanding of what happened in the end, where each person ended up. In keeping with this Kingsolver foreshadows many of the plot points in a heavy-handed way. For the most part the reader knows what is going to happen well before the action takes place. Somehow it doesn't mar the story. It reads like a person telling a joke and letting slip the punchline, long before they are supposed to. It doesn't mean it is not just as enjoyable, it is just not surprising.
Memory also is the thing each person carries out of the Congo with them. The memory of what has happened shapes the lives of each character. Each character remains true to the original sketch of themselves, but because we are looking back, they tell only the things they think are important to who they are now. Each one a pragmatist, a scholar, a narcissist, a survivor. The reader gets from them just what they want to give; but cleverly, he knows more about them than they think he does. This is due to the device of multiple narrators. Kingsolver tells her story through the eyes of the Price women. Each is a a fully realized character, with her own narrative style. My favorite is Adah, the crooked-backed, palindrome spouting, lesser-twin to Leah. Her story resonates more fully because she uses words sparingly and speaks even fewer. Her chapters are rich because the reader would not know her otherwise. Each of the other characters are easily understood through the telling of their counterparts; but because Adah is silent most of the time, she is privileged to tell her story her way. She is easily one of the most compelling characters in modern literature.
With memory comes regret. Kingsolver deals with this in various ways, but no more clearly than here, the words of Orleanna Price:
Try to imagine what never happened: our family without Africa, or the Africa that would have been without us. Look at your sisters now. Lock, stock, and barrel, they've got their own three ways to live with our history. Some can find it. Many more never do. But which one among you is without sin? I can hardly think where to cast my stones, so I just go on keening for my own losses, trying to wear the marks of the boot on my back as gracefully as the Congo wears hers.The scars remain; the bruises, and the illnesses never healed. But the characters learn how to deal with regret, by understanding it must have been this way. The story could not be told, but by walking down that particular road. What they would have been otherwise is unthinkable; this is who they are now.
I could write a whole other post on the particulars of the theology that took them there. A works-based system, insisting the justice (in human perception) of God would reward the "goodness" of a man bent on becoming a spiritual giant, without any of the tools necessary. I would set it against the backdrop of a tribal theology that is not very far displaced from the theology of the missionary, just set on a different focal point. This could be discussed in grand detail to tedium by this humble church history (theology) major, but I have already said the most important stuff regarding this book. Read it for yourself and discover a world of themes hidden just under the skin, like the zillion parasites of the Congolese jungle.
Rating: 4.5 out of 7
-L
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)